[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAG48ez1BExw7DdCEeRD1hG5ZpRObpGDodnizW2xD5tC0saTDqg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 17:05:45 +0200
From: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
To: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] vfs: add RWF_NOAPPEND flag for pwritev2
On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 4:00 AM Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> wrote:
> The pwrite function, originally defined by POSIX (thus the "p"), is
> defined to ignore O_APPEND and write at the offset passed as its
> argument. However, historically Linux honored O_APPEND if set and
> ignored the offset. This cannot be changed due to stability policy,
> but is documented in the man page as a bug.
>
> Now that there's a pwritev2 syscall providing a superset of the pwrite
> functionality that has a flags argument, the conforming behavior can
> be offered to userspace via a new flag.
[...]
> diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
[...]
> @@ -3411,6 +3413,8 @@ static inline int kiocb_set_rw_flags(struct kiocb *ki, rwf_t flags)
> ki->ki_flags |= (IOCB_DSYNC | IOCB_SYNC);
> if (flags & RWF_APPEND)
> ki->ki_flags |= IOCB_APPEND;
> + if (flags & RWF_NOAPPEND)
> + ki->ki_flags &= ~IOCB_APPEND;
> return 0;
> }
Linux enforces the S_APPEND flag (set by "chattr +a") only at open()
time, not at write() time:
# touch testfile
# exec 100>testfile
# echo foo > testfile
# cat testfile
foo
# chattr +a testfile
# echo bar > testfile
bash: testfile: Operation not permitted
# echo bar >&100
# cat testfile
bar
#
At open() time, the kernel enforces that you can't use O_WRONLY/O_RDWR
without also setting O_APPEND if the file is marked as append-only:
static int may_open(const struct path *path, int acc_mode, int flag)
{
[...]
/*
* An append-only file must be opened in append mode for writing.
*/
if (IS_APPEND(inode)) {
if ((flag & O_ACCMODE) != O_RDONLY && !(flag & O_APPEND))
return -EPERM;
if (flag & O_TRUNC)
return -EPERM;
}
[...]
}
It seems to me like your patch will permit bypassing S_APPEND by
opening an append-only file with O_WRONLY|O_APPEND, then calling
pwritev2() with RWF_NOAPPEND? I think you'll have to add an extra
check for IS_APPEND() somewhere.
One could also argue that if an O_APPEND file descriptor is handed
across privilege boundaries, a programmer might reasonably expect that
the recipient will not be able to use the file descriptor for
non-append writes; if that is not actually true, that should probably
be noted in the open.2 manpage, at the end of the description of
O_APPEND.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists