[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <61996dcd-6db1-13fc-8239-7e684f3ec49e@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 11:23:49 +0800
From: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
To: Daeho Jeong <daeho43@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, kernel-team@...roid.com
Cc: Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: prevent compressed file from being
disabled after releasing cblocks
On 2020-8-28 13:46, Daeho Jeong wrote:
> From: Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@...gle.com>
>
> After releasing cblocks, the compressed file can be accidentally
> disabled in compression mode, since it has zero cblocks. As we are
> using IMMUTABLE flag to present released cblocks state, we can add
> IMMUTABLE state check when considering the compressed file disabling.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@...gle.com>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> index 02811ce15059..14d30740ba03 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> @@ -3936,6 +3936,8 @@ static inline u64 f2fs_disable_compressed_file(struct inode *inode)
> if (!f2fs_compressed_file(inode))
> return 0;
> if (S_ISREG(inode->i_mode)) {
> + if (IS_IMMUTABLE(inode))
> + return 1;
It looks most of callers are from ioctl, should we add immutable check in f2fs
ioctl interfaces if necessary? or I missed existed check.
Thanks,
> if (get_dirty_pages(inode))
> return 1;
> if (fi->i_compr_blocks)
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists