[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200830202822.GA950472@ravnborg.org>
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 22:28:22 +0200
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Cc: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>,
何小龙 <Leon.He@...soc.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Noralf Tronnes <noralf@...nnes.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, od@...c.me,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: 答复: [PATCH v2 6/6]
drm/panel: Add Ilitek ILI9341 DBI panel driver
Hi Laurent.
> >
> > Please read the cover letter, it explains why it's done this way. The
> > whole point of this patchset is to merge DSI and DBI frameworks in a
> > way that can be maintained.
>
> I think this proves the point that the proposed naming is confusing. At
> least a rename would be required.
Do you have any inputs on the amount of rename we are looking into.
Is this a simple s/struct mipi_dsi_device/struct mipi_dxi_device/
or something more?
We should script the rename as it will tocuh a lot of files,
and without a script we would chase this. But once it is scripted
it would be trivial to perform.
I did not look at this enough, but I had an idea that we
would have do to a s/dsi/dxi/ in a lot of places.
(dxi is my best proposal at the moment for something covering both dsi
and dbi).
PS. I am travelling for a few days, so do not expect quick responses.
Sam
Powered by blists - more mailing lists