linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation/x86: Add documentation for /proc/cpuinfo feature flags

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <58ec8ad4f6712fb8aa3db08e4a8d661d5531d7a0.camel@intel.com>
Date:   Sun, 30 Aug 2020 14:21:03 -0700
From:   Kyung Min Park <kyung.min.park@...el.com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
        tony.luck@...el.com, dave.hansen@...el.com, ricardo.neri@...el.com,
        hpa@...or.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, ak@...ux.intel.com,
        ravi.v.shankar@...el.com,
        Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation/x86: Add documentation for
 /proc/cpuinfo feature flags

On Sun, 2020-08-30 at 13:50 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 03:30:32PM -0700, Kyung Min Park wrote:
> > Should I mention the tool specifically although the tool is WIP?
> 
> Well, if you wanna look at it that way, the whole kernel is
> constantly
> and forever WIP. :-)
> 
> Also, if there's some functionality missing, pointing to it might
> make
> people send patches.

That makes sense. :)

> > As you commented previously, should I use
> > tools/arch/x86/tools/cpuid/cpuid as the future tool and its
> > location?
> 
> Yeah, let's just drop the second "tools", i.e.,
> 
> tools/arch/x86/kcpuid/
> 
> or so should be good enough.
> 
> Thx.

Sure, I'll update in the next patch. Thank you for clarifying.