[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAeHK+z9xVfW_W1u=ZatPXQ+2UH9khuW2yM96BcgLmm8ENzymg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 20:59:04 +0200
From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: albert.linde@...il.com, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, akinobu.mita@...il.com,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
Albert van der Linde <alinde@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] add fault injection to user memory access
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 8:32 PM Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 31 Aug 2020 17:17:30 +0000 albert.linde@...il.com wrote:
>
> > The goal of this series is to improve testing of fault-tolerance in
> > usages of user memory access functions, by adding support for fault
> > injection.
>
> Does anyone actually plan to use this feature, on an ongoing basis?
> It's the sort of thing which the various test robots could exploit, but
> I'm not sure that they are using fault injection?
Hi Andrew,
syzkaller/syzbot is using the existing fault injection modes and will
use this particular feature too.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists