[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3048ecb50bba7819ac9c40d3ff2f1ed60585bc48.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 15:26:52 -0400
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>,
"mjg59@...gle.com" <mjg59@...gle.com>
Cc: "linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org" <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Silviu Vlasceanu <Silviu.Vlasceanu@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] evm: Load EVM key in ima_load_x509() to avoid
appraisal
On Mon, 2020-08-31 at 09:44 +0000, Roberto Sassu wrote:
>
> > As much as possible IMA and EVM should remain independent of each
> > other. Modifying integrity_load_x509() doesn't help. This looks like
> > a good reason for calling another EVM function from within IMA.
>
> Can I add your Reviewed-by?
Yes, that's fine.
Mimi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists