linux-kernel - [RESEND][PATCH 3/7] ia64/sba_iommu: Avoid overflow at boundary

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200831203811.8494-4-nicoleotsuka@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 31 Aug 2020 13:38:07 -0700
From:   Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>
To:     mpe@...erman.id.au, benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org,
        rth@...ddle.net, ink@...assic.park.msu.ru, mattst88@...il.com,
        tony.luck@...el.com, fenghua.yu@...el.com, schnelle@...ux.ibm.com,
        gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com, hca@...ux.ibm.com,
        gor@...ux.ibm.com, borntraeger@...ibm.com, davem@...emloft.net,
        tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, x86@...nel.org,
        hpa@...or.com, James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com, deller@....de
Cc:     sfr@...b.auug.org.au, hch@....de, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RESEND][PATCH 3/7] ia64/sba_iommu: Avoid overflow at boundary_size

The boundary_size might be as large as ULONG_MAX, which means
that a device has no specific boundary limit. So either "+ 1"
or passing it to ALIGN() would potentially overflow.

According to kernel defines:
    #define ALIGN_MASK(x, mask) (((x) + (mask)) & ~(mask))
    #define ALIGN(x, a)	ALIGN_MASK(x, (typeof(x))(a) - 1)

We can simplify the logic here:
  ALIGN(boundary + 1, 1 << shift) >> shift
= ALIGN_MASK(b + 1, (1 << s) - 1) >> s
= {[b + 1 + (1 << s) - 1] & ~[(1 << s) - 1]} >> s
= [b + 1 + (1 << s) - 1] >> s
= [b + (1 << s)] >> s
= (b >> s) + 1

So fixing a potential overflow with the safer shortcut.

Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
---
 arch/ia64/hp/common/sba_iommu.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/ia64/hp/common/sba_iommu.c b/arch/ia64/hp/common/sba_iommu.c
index 656a4888c300..945954903bb0 100644
--- a/arch/ia64/hp/common/sba_iommu.c
+++ b/arch/ia64/hp/common/sba_iommu.c
@@ -485,8 +485,8 @@ sba_search_bitmap(struct ioc *ioc, struct device *dev,
 	ASSERT(((unsigned long) ioc->res_hint & (sizeof(unsigned long) - 1UL)) == 0);
 	ASSERT(res_ptr < res_end);
 
-	boundary_size = (unsigned long long)dma_get_seg_boundary(dev) + 1;
-	boundary_size = ALIGN(boundary_size, 1ULL << iovp_shift) >> iovp_shift;
+	/* Overflow-free shortcut for: ALIGN(b + 1, 1 << s) >> s */
+	boundary_size = (dma_get_seg_boundary(dev) >> iovp_shift) + 1;
 
 	BUG_ON(ioc->ibase & ~iovp_mask);
 	shift = ioc->ibase >> iovp_shift;
-- 
2.17.1