[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200831163048.0cbeca5d@lwn.net>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 16:30:48 -0600
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
"Gustavo A . R . Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
"Alexander A. Klimov" <grandmaster@...klimov.de>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation: add minimum clang/llvm version
On Wed, 26 Aug 2020 12:15:55 -0700
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com> wrote:
> Based on a vote at the LLVM BoF at Plumbers 2020, we decided to start
> small, supporting just one formal upstream release of LLVM for now.
>
> We can probably widen the support window of supported versions over
> time. Also, note that LLVM's release process is different than GCC's.
> GCC tends to have 1 major release per year while releasing minor updates
> to the past 3 major versions. LLVM tends to support one major release
> and one minor release every six months.
>
> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
> Tested-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@...nel.org>
> Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Applied, thanks.
jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists