linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] scripts: Add intended executable mode and SPDX license

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 30 Aug 2020 17:44:09 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Mrinal Pandey <mrinalmni@...il.com>
Cc:     skhan@...uxfoundation.org,
        Linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
        lukas.bulwahn@...il.com, keescook@...omium.org, re.emese@...il.com,
        maennich@...gle.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-spdx@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scripts: Add intended executable mode and SPDX license

On Thu, 27 Aug 2020 14:54:05 +0530 Mrinal Pandey <mrinalmni@...il.com> wrote:

> commit b72231eb7084 ("scripts: add spdxcheck.py self test") added the file
> spdxcheck-test.sh to the repository without the executable flag and license
> information.

The x bit shouldn't matter.

If someone downloads and applies patch-5.9.xz (which is a supported way
of obtaining a kernel) then patch(1) will erase the x bit anyway.

Is some other script invoking spdxcheck-test.sh directly, instead of
using `/bin/sh spdxcheck-test.sh'?  If so, please let's fix that.