lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 17:44:09 -0700 From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> To: Mrinal Pandey <mrinalmni@...il.com> Cc: skhan@...uxfoundation.org, Linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org, lukas.bulwahn@...il.com, keescook@...omium.org, re.emese@...il.com, maennich@...gle.com, tglx@...utronix.de, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-spdx@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] scripts: Add intended executable mode and SPDX license On Thu, 27 Aug 2020 14:54:05 +0530 Mrinal Pandey <mrinalmni@...il.com> wrote: > commit b72231eb7084 ("scripts: add spdxcheck.py self test") added the file > spdxcheck-test.sh to the repository without the executable flag and license > information. The x bit shouldn't matter. If someone downloads and applies patch-5.9.xz (which is a supported way of obtaining a kernel) then patch(1) will erase the x bit anyway. Is some other script invoking spdxcheck-test.sh directly, instead of using `/bin/sh spdxcheck-test.sh'? If so, please let's fix that.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists