lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200831000506.GA7421@epycbox.lan>
Date:   Sun, 30 Aug 2020 17:05:06 -0700
From:   Moritz Fischer <mdf@...nel.org>
To:     Luca Ceresoli <luca@...aceresoli.net>
Cc:     linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org, Moritz Fischer <mdf@...nel.org>,
        Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>,
        Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Anatolij Gustschin <agust@...x.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] fpga manager: xilinx-spi: remove stray comment

On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 06:38:46PM +0200, Luca Ceresoli wrote:
> Remove comment committed by mistake.
> 
> Fixes: dd2784c01d93 ("fpga manager: xilinx-spi: check INIT_B pin during write_init")
> Reviewed-by: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli <luca@...aceresoli.net>
> 
> ---
> 
> Changes in v4:
>  - add Reviewed-by Tom Rix
> 
> Changes in v3: none.
> 
> Changes in v2: none.
> ---
>  drivers/fpga/xilinx-spi.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/xilinx-spi.c b/drivers/fpga/xilinx-spi.c
> index 2967aa2a74e2..502fae0d1d85 100644
> --- a/drivers/fpga/xilinx-spi.c
> +++ b/drivers/fpga/xilinx-spi.c
> @@ -57,7 +57,6 @@ static int wait_for_init_b(struct fpga_manager *mgr, int value,
>  
>  	if (conf->init_b) {
>  		while (time_before(jiffies, timeout)) {
> -			/* dump_state(conf, "wait for init_d .."); */
>  			if (gpiod_get_value(conf->init_b) == value)
>  				return 0;
>  			usleep_range(100, 400);
> -- 
> 2.28.0
> 
Earlier version was applied to for-next (forgot-push) ...

Thanks,
Moritz

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ