lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87mu2bi900.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date:   Mon, 31 Aug 2020 09:12:47 +0200
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT pull] x86/urgent for v5.9-rc2

On Sun, Aug 30 2020 at 12:13, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 11:04 AM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>>
>>    The historical inconsistent for_each_cpu() behaviour of
>>    ignoring the cpumask and unconditionally claiming that CPU0 is in the
>>    mask struck again. Sigh.
>
> I guess we could remove the UP optimizations these days. It's not like
> they matter like they used to.

Indeed.

> Or leave the optimizations in the sense that they wouldn't do the
> crazy bit searching, but they could look at bit 0 of the mask they're
> passed..

Yes, that's trivial enough and the compiler should turn the whole thing
into a simple conditional checking bit 0 and remove the rest of the loop
gunk.

Thanks,

        tglx

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ