linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] Add Intel LGM soc DMA support.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6a2e572e-c169-21d5-d36f-23972a24cc54@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 31 Aug 2020 16:07:29 +0800
From:   "Reddy, MallikarjunaX" <mallikarjunax.reddy@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
        vkoul@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, andriy.shevchenko@...el.com,
        cheol.yong.kim@...el.com, qi-ming.wu@...el.com,
        chuanhua.lei@...ux.intel.com, malliamireddy009@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] Add Intel LGM soc DMA support.


On 8/28/2020 7:17 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 27/08/2020 17.41, Reddy, MallikarjunaX wrote:
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +    dma_dev->device_alloc_chan_resources =
>>>>>> +        d->inst->ops->device_alloc_chan_resources;
>>>>>> +    dma_dev->device_free_chan_resources =
>>>>>> +        d->inst->ops->device_free_chan_resources;
>>>>>> +    dma_dev->device_terminate_all =
>>>>>> d->inst->ops->device_terminate_all;
>>>>>> +    dma_dev->device_issue_pending =
>>>>>> d->inst->ops->device_issue_pending;
>>>>>> +    dma_dev->device_tx_status = d->inst->ops->device_tx_status;
>>>>>> +    dma_dev->device_resume = d->inst->ops->device_resume;
>>>>>> +    dma_dev->device_pause = d->inst->ops->device_pause;
>>>>>> +    dma_dev->device_config = d->inst->ops->device_config;
>>>>>> +    dma_dev->device_prep_slave_sg =
>>>>>> d->inst->ops->device_prep_slave_sg;
>>>>>> +    dma_dev->device_synchronize = d->inst->ops->device_synchronize;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +    if (d->ver == DMA_VER22) {
>>>>>> +        dma_dev->src_addr_widths = BIT(DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_4_BYTES);
>>>>>> +        dma_dev->dst_addr_widths = BIT(DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_4_BYTES);
>>>>>> +        dma_dev->directions = BIT(DMA_MEM_TO_DEV) |
>>>>>> +                      BIT(DMA_DEV_TO_MEM);
>>>>>> +        dma_dev->residue_granularity =
>>>>>> +                    DMA_RESIDUE_GRANULARITY_DESCRIPTOR;
>>>>>> +    }
>>>>> So, if version is != DMA_VER22, then you don't support any direction?
>>>>> Why register the DMA device if it can not do any transfer?
>>>> Only dma0 instance (intel,lgm-cdma) is used as a general purpose slave
>>>> DMA. we set both control and datapath here.
>>>> Other instances we set only control path. data path is taken care by dma
>>>> client(GSWIP).
>>> How the client (GSWIP) can request a channel from intel,lgm-* ? Don't
>>> you need some capabilities for the DMA device so core can sort out the
>>> request?
>> client request channel by name, dma_request_slave_channel(dev, name);
> clients should use dma_request_chan(dev, name);
>
> If the channel can be requested via DT or ACPI then we don't check the
> capabilities at all, so yes, that could work.
>
>>>> Only thing needs to do is get the channel, set the descriptor and just
>>>> on the channel.
>>> How do you 'on' the channel?
>> we on the channel in issue_pending.
> Right.
> Basically you only prep_slave_sg/single for the DMA_VER22? Or do you
> that for the others w/o direction support?
Yes. prep_slave_sg/single only for the DMA_VER22.
>
> For the intel,lgm-* DMAs you only call issue_pending() and probably
> terminate_all?
Yes, correct.
>
> Interesting setup ;)
>
> - Péter
>
> Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki.
> Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki
>