| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20200831120908.GD1689119@ulmo>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 14:09:08 +0200
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To: JC Kuo <jckuo@...dia.com>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, robh@...nel.org, jonathanh@...dia.com,
kishon@...com, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, nkristam@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/12] soc/tegra: pmc: provide usb sleepwalk register
map
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 12:40:37PM +0800, JC Kuo wrote:
> This commit implements a register map which grants USB (UTMI and HSIC)
> sleepwalk registers access to USB phy drivers. The USB sleepwalk logic
> is in PMC hardware block but USB phy drivers have the best knowledge
> of proper programming sequence. This approach prevents using custom
> pmc APIs.
>
> Signed-off-by: JC Kuo <jckuo@...dia.com>
> ---
> drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 89 insertions(+)
Same comment as in earlier patches regarding the subject and "USB PHY"
in the commit message.
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c b/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c
> index d332e5d9abac..03317978915a 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c
> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
> #include <linux/seq_file.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/spinlock.h>
> +#include <linux/regmap.h>
>
> #include <soc/tegra/common.h>
> #include <soc/tegra/fuse.h>
> @@ -102,6 +103,9 @@
>
> #define PMC_PWR_DET_VALUE 0xe4
>
> +#define PMC_USB_DEBOUNCE_DEL 0xec
> +#define PMC_USB_AO 0xf0
> +
> #define PMC_SCRATCH41 0x140
>
> #define PMC_WAKE2_MASK 0x160
> @@ -133,6 +137,13 @@
> #define IO_DPD2_STATUS 0x1c4
> #define SEL_DPD_TIM 0x1c8
>
> +#define PMC_UTMIP_UHSIC_TRIGGERS 0x1ec
> +#define PMC_UTMIP_UHSIC_SAVED_STATE 0x1f0
> +
> +#define PMC_UTMIP_TERM_PAD_CFG 0x1f8
> +#define PMC_UTMIP_UHSIC_SLEEP_CFG 0x1fc
> +#define PMC_UTMIP_UHSIC_FAKE 0x218
> +
> #define PMC_SCRATCH54 0x258
> #define PMC_SCRATCH54_DATA_SHIFT 8
> #define PMC_SCRATCH54_ADDR_SHIFT 0
> @@ -145,8 +156,18 @@
> #define PMC_SCRATCH55_CHECKSUM_SHIFT 16
> #define PMC_SCRATCH55_I2CSLV1_SHIFT 0
>
> +#define PMC_UTMIP_UHSIC_LINE_WAKEUP 0x26c
> +
> +#define PMC_UTMIP_BIAS_MASTER_CNTRL 0x270
> +#define PMC_UTMIP_MASTER_CONFIG 0x274
> +#define PMC_UTMIP_UHSIC2_TRIGGERS 0x27c
> +#define PMC_UTMIP_MASTER2_CONFIG 0x29c
> +
> #define GPU_RG_CNTRL 0x2d4
>
> +#define PMC_UTMIP_PAD_CFG0 0x4c0
> +#define PMC_UTMIP_UHSIC_SLEEP_CFG1 0x4d0
> +#define PMC_UTMIP_SLEEPWALK_P3 0x4e0
> /* Tegra186 and later */
> #define WAKE_AOWAKE_CNTRL(x) (0x000 + ((x) << 2))
> #define WAKE_AOWAKE_CNTRL_LEVEL (1 << 3)
> @@ -334,6 +355,7 @@ struct tegra_pmc_soc {
> const struct pmc_clk_init_data *pmc_clks_data;
> unsigned int num_pmc_clks;
> bool has_blink_output;
> + bool has_usb_sleepwalk;
> };
>
> static const char * const tegra186_reset_sources[] = {
> @@ -2495,6 +2517,67 @@ static void tegra_pmc_clock_register(struct tegra_pmc *pmc,
> err);
> }
>
> +#define regmap_reg(x) regmap_reg_range(x, x)
This doesn't seem like a good idea. What if anyone ever thought it was a
good idea to add this to the core regmap header? We'd get a naming
conflict that would first have to get resolved.
> +static const struct regmap_range pmc_usb_sleepwalk_ranges[] = {
> + regmap_reg_range(PMC_USB_DEBOUNCE_DEL, PMC_USB_AO),
> + regmap_reg_range(PMC_UTMIP_UHSIC_TRIGGERS, PMC_UTMIP_UHSIC_SAVED_STATE),
> + regmap_reg_range(PMC_UTMIP_TERM_PAD_CFG, PMC_UTMIP_UHSIC_FAKE),
> + regmap_reg(PMC_UTMIP_UHSIC_LINE_WAKEUP),
> + regmap_reg_range(PMC_UTMIP_BIAS_MASTER_CNTRL, PMC_UTMIP_MASTER_CONFIG),
> + regmap_reg_range(PMC_UTMIP_UHSIC2_TRIGGERS, PMC_UTMIP_MASTER2_CONFIG),
> + regmap_reg_range(PMC_UTMIP_PAD_CFG0, PMC_UTMIP_UHSIC_SLEEP_CFG1),
> + regmap_reg(PMC_UTMIP_SLEEPWALK_P3),
> +};
Since we only have two usages of the regmap_reg() macro, perhaps just
use regmap_reg_range() with the same parameter used twice?
> +
> +static const struct regmap_access_table pmc_usb_sleepwalk_table = {
> + .yes_ranges = pmc_usb_sleepwalk_ranges,
> + .n_yes_ranges = ARRAY_SIZE(pmc_usb_sleepwalk_ranges),
> +};
> +
> +static int tegra_pmc_regmap_readl(void *context, unsigned int reg, unsigned int *val)
s/reg/offset/ to make it clearer what this really is. Also: s/val/value/ to
avoid potential confusion with "valid".
> +{
> + struct tegra_pmc *pmc = context;
> +
> + *val = tegra_pmc_readl(pmc, reg);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int tegra_pmc_regmap_writel(void *context, unsigned int reg, unsigned int val)
> +{
> + struct tegra_pmc *pmc = context;
> +
> + tegra_pmc_writel(pmc, val, reg);
> + return 0;
> +}
Same here.
> +
> +static const struct regmap_config usb_sleepwalk_regmap_config = {
> + .name = "usb_sleepwalk",
> + .reg_bits = 32,
> + .val_bits = 32,
> + .reg_stride = 4,
> + .fast_io = true,
> + .rd_table = &pmc_usb_sleepwalk_table,
> + .wr_table = &pmc_usb_sleepwalk_table,
> + .reg_read = tegra_pmc_regmap_readl,
> + .reg_write = tegra_pmc_regmap_writel,
> +};
> +
> +static int tegra_pmc_regmap_init(struct tegra_pmc *pmc)
> +{
> + struct regmap *regmap;
> +
> + if (pmc->soc->has_usb_sleepwalk) {
> + regmap = devm_regmap_init(pmc->dev, NULL, (__force void *)pmc,
Do you really need that __force in there?
> + &usb_sleepwalk_regmap_config);
> + if (IS_ERR(regmap)) {
> + dev_err(pmc->dev, "failed to allocate register map\n");
Maybe output the error code here?
> + return PTR_ERR(regmap);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int tegra_pmc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> void __iomem *base;
> @@ -2613,6 +2696,10 @@ static int tegra_pmc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> pmc->base = base;
> mutex_unlock(&pmc->powergates_lock);
>
> + err = tegra_pmc_regmap_init(pmc);
> + if (err < 0)
> + goto cleanup_powergates;
You could call this perhaps a little bit earlier to avoid having to
clean up powergates? Since you register with devm_regmap_init() you
won't have to clean this up manually.
For that reason it makes sense as a general rule to initialize devm
things before anything that's not managed (unless, of course, if it
doesn't make any sense).
> +
> tegra_pmc_clock_register(pmc, pdev->dev.of_node);
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pmc);
>
> @@ -2976,6 +3063,7 @@ static const struct tegra_pmc_soc tegra124_pmc_soc = {
> .pmc_clks_data = tegra_pmc_clks_data,
> .num_pmc_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(tegra_pmc_clks_data),
> .has_blink_output = true,
> + .has_usb_sleepwalk = true,
> };
>
> static const char * const tegra210_powergates[] = {
> @@ -3094,6 +3182,7 @@ static const struct tegra_pmc_soc tegra210_pmc_soc = {
> .pmc_clks_data = tegra_pmc_clks_data,
> .num_pmc_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(tegra_pmc_clks_data),
> .has_blink_output = true,
> + .has_usb_sleepwalk = true,
> };
>
> #define TEGRA186_IO_PAD_TABLE(_pad) \
I'd prefer if we explicitly set this to false on SoC generations where
we don't have sleepwalk support (or don't need to deal with it in the
kernel). That avoids confusion as to whether this was simply forgotten
or whether the omission was on purpose.
Thierry
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists