[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <051afb2d-dd2e-0ea4-d8a9-980f5df136b7@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 10:15:37 -0500
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
To: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tiwai@...e.de, broonie@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
jank@...ence.com, srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org,
rander.wang@...ux.intel.com, ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com,
hui.wang@...onical.com, sanyog.r.kale@...el.com,
mengdong.lin@...el.com, bard.liao@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/11] soundwire: intel: add dynamic debug trace for
clock-stop invalid configs
>>>>>> Detect cases where the clock is assumed to be stopped but the IP is
>>>>>> not in the relevant state, and add a dynamic debug trace.
>>>>>
>>>>> you meant a debug print..and it looks like error print below (also in title).
>>>>
>>>> I don't understand the comment. Is the 'trace' confusing and are you asking
>>>> to e.g. change the commit message to 'add dynamic debug log'?
>>>
>>> Question is what is dynamic about this?
>> dev_dbg() is part of the kernel dynamic debug capability...
>>
>> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/admin-guide/dynamic-debug-howto.html
>>
>> Not sure what you are asking here?
>
> :-| where is dev_dbg() ?
>
> See [1]
>
> [1]
>
>> + dev_err(dev, "%s invalid configuration, clock was not stopped", __func__);
>
> ^^^^^^^
it's still a log using the "dynamic debug" framework.
Again, what are you asking us to fix?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists