linux-kernel - Re: [rcuperf] 4e88ec4a9e: UBSAN:division-overflow_in

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200831155037.GZ2855@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>
Date:   Mon, 31 Aug 2020 08:50:37 -0700
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To:     kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, lkp@...ts.01.org
Subject: Re: [rcuperf] 4e88ec4a9e:
 UBSAN:division-overflow_in_arch/x86/include/asm/div64.h

On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 08:01:22PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> Greeting,
> 
> FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with gcc-9):
> 
> commit: 4e88ec4a9eb17527e640b063f79e5b875733eb53 ("rcuperf: Change rcuperf to rcuscale")
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
> 
> 
> in testcase: trinity
> with following parameters:
> 
> 	runtime: 300s
> 
> test-description: Trinity is a linux system call fuzz tester.
> test-url: http://codemonkey.org.uk/projects/trinity/
> 
> 
> on test machine: qemu-system-i386 -enable-kvm -cpu SandyBridge -smp 2 -m 8G
> 
> caused below changes (please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire log/backtrace):
> 
> 
> +---------------------------------------------------------+------------+------------+
> |                                                         | 65bd77f554 | 4e88ec4a9e |
> +---------------------------------------------------------+------------+------------+
> | boot_successes                                          | 13         | 0          |
> | boot_failures                                           | 0          | 14         |
> | UBSAN:division-overflow_in_arch/x86/include/asm/div64.h | 0          | 14         |
> | error:#[##]                                             | 0          | 14         |
> | EIP:main_func.cold                                      | 0          | 14         |
> | Kernel_panic-not_syncing:Fatal_exception                | 0          | 14         |
> +---------------------------------------------------------+------------+------------+
> 
> 
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>

Does the patch below fix this for you?

							Thanx, Paul

------------------------------------------------------------------------

commit d301e320e952e2e604d83d9540e52510b0eb3d94
Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
Date:   Thu Aug 27 09:58:19 2020 -0700

    refscale: Bounds-check module parameters
    
    The default value for refscale.nreaders is -1, which results in the code
    setting the value to three-quarters of the number of CPUs.  On single-CPU
    systems, this results in three-quarters of the value one, which the C
    language's integer arithmetic rounds to zero.  This in turn results in
    a divide-by-zero error.
    
    This commit therefore adds bounds checking to the refscale module
    parameters, so that if they are less than one, they are set to the
    value one.
    
    Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
    Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/refscale.c b/kernel/rcu/refscale.c
index 952595c..fb5f20d 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/refscale.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/refscale.c
@@ -681,6 +681,12 @@ ref_scale_init(void)
 	// Reader tasks (default to ~75% of online CPUs).
 	if (nreaders < 0)
 		nreaders = (num_online_cpus() >> 1) + (num_online_cpus() >> 2);
+	if (WARN_ONCE(loops <= 0, "%s: loops = %ld, adjusted to 1\n", __func__, loops))
+		loops = 1;
+	if (WARN_ONCE(nreaders <= 0, "%s: nreaders = %d, adjusted to 1\n", __func__, nreaders))
+		nreaders = 1;
+	if (WARN_ONCE(nruns <= 0, "%s: nruns = %d, adjusted to 1\n", __func__, nruns))
+		nruns = 1;
 	reader_tasks = kcalloc(nreaders, sizeof(reader_tasks[0]),
 			       GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!reader_tasks) {