linux-kernel - [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/3] docs: Fix typo in synchronize

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200831175452.32381-1-paulmck@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 31 Aug 2020 10:54:50 -0700
From:   paulmck@...nel.org
To:     rcu@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com, mingo@...nel.org,
        jiangshanlai@...il.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
        josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
        rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
        fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com, joel@...lfernandes.org,
        Tobias Klauser <tklauser@...tanz.ch>,
        "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/3] docs: Fix typo in synchronize_rcu() function name

From: Tobias Klauser <tklauser@...tanz.ch>

s/sychronize_rcu/synchronize_rcu/

Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <tklauser@...tanz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
---
 Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.rst | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.rst b/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.rst
index c7f147b..fb3ff76 100644
--- a/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.rst
+++ b/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.rst
@@ -360,7 +360,7 @@ order to amortize their overhead over many uses of the corresponding APIs.
 
 There are at least three flavors of RCU usage in the Linux kernel. The diagram
 above shows the most common one. On the updater side, the rcu_assign_pointer(),
-sychronize_rcu() and call_rcu() primitives used are the same for all three
+synchronize_rcu() and call_rcu() primitives used are the same for all three
 flavors. However for protection (on the reader side), the primitives used vary
 depending on the flavor:
 
-- 
2.9.5