linux-kernel - [PATCH tip/core/rcu 18/24] rcu: Move rcu_cpu_started per-CPU variable to rcu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200831180116.32690-18-paulmck@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 31 Aug 2020 11:01:10 -0700
From:   paulmck@...nel.org
To:     rcu@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com, mingo@...nel.org,
        jiangshanlai@...il.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
        josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
        rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
        fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com, joel@...lfernandes.org,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 18/24] rcu: Move rcu_cpu_started per-CPU variable to rcu_data

From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>

When the rcu_cpu_started per-CPU variable was added by commit
f64c6013a202 ("rcu/x86: Provide early rcu_cpu_starting() callback"),
there were multiple sets of per-CPU rcu_data structures.  Therefore, the
rcu_cpu_started flag was added as a separate per-CPU variable.  But now
there is only one set of per-CPU rcu_data structures, so this commit
moves rcu_cpu_started to a new ->cpu_started field in that structure.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c | 11 ++++-------
 kernel/rcu/tree.h |  1 +
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index da05afc..52108dd 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -3967,8 +3967,6 @@ int rcutree_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, rcu_cpu_started);
-
 /*
  * Mark the specified CPU as being online so that subsequent grace periods
  * (both expedited and normal) will wait on it.  Note that this means that
@@ -3988,12 +3986,11 @@ void rcu_cpu_starting(unsigned int cpu)
 	struct rcu_node *rnp;
 	bool newcpu;
 
-	if (per_cpu(rcu_cpu_started, cpu))
+	rdp = per_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data, cpu);
+	if (rdp->cpu_started)
 		return;
+	rdp->cpu_started = true;
 
-	per_cpu(rcu_cpu_started, cpu) = 1;
-
-	rdp = per_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data, cpu);
 	rnp = rdp->mynode;
 	mask = rdp->grpmask;
 	raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
@@ -4053,7 +4050,7 @@ void rcu_report_dead(unsigned int cpu)
 	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
 	raw_spin_unlock(&rcu_state.ofl_lock);
 
-	per_cpu(rcu_cpu_started, cpu) = 0;
+	rdp->cpu_started = false;
 }
 
 /*
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.h b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
index c96ae35..309bc7f 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
@@ -156,6 +156,7 @@ struct rcu_data {
 	bool		beenonline;	/* CPU online at least once. */
 	bool		gpwrap;		/* Possible ->gp_seq wrap. */
 	bool		exp_deferred_qs; /* This CPU awaiting a deferred QS? */
+	bool		cpu_started;	/* RCU watching this onlining CPU. */
 	struct rcu_node *mynode;	/* This CPU's leaf of hierarchy */
 	unsigned long grpmask;		/* Mask to apply to leaf qsmask. */
 	unsigned long	ticks_this_gp;	/* The number of scheduling-clock */
-- 
2.9.5