linux-kernel - [PATCH tip/core/rcu 13/19] scftorture: Prevent compiler from reducing race probabilities

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200831180749.843-13-paulmck@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 31 Aug 2020 11:07:43 -0700
From:   paulmck@...nel.org
To:     rcu@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com, mingo@...nel.org,
        jiangshanlai@...il.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
        josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
        rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
        fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com, joel@...lfernandes.org,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 13/19] scftorture: Prevent compiler from reducing race probabilities

From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>

Detecting smp_call_function() memory misordering requires close timing,
so it is necessary to have the checks immediately before and after
the call to the smp_call_function*() function under test.  This commit
therefore inserts barrier() calls to prevent the compiler from optimizing
memory-misordering detection down into the zone of extreme improbability.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
---
 kernel/scftorture.c | 10 ++++++++--
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/scftorture.c b/kernel/scftorture.c
index 880c2ce..8349681 100644
--- a/kernel/scftorture.c
+++ b/kernel/scftorture.c
@@ -322,6 +322,7 @@ static void scftorture_invoke_one(struct scf_statistics *scfp, struct torture_ra
 			scfp->n_single++;
 		if (scfcp) {
 			scfcp->scfc_cpu = cpu;
+			barrier(); // Prevent race-reduction compiler optimizations.
 			scfcp->scfc_in = true;
 		}
 		ret = smp_call_function_single(cpu, scf_handler_1, (void *)scfcp, scfsp->scfs_wait);
@@ -339,8 +340,10 @@ static void scftorture_invoke_one(struct scf_statistics *scfp, struct torture_ra
 			scfp->n_many_wait++;
 		else
 			scfp->n_many++;
-		if (scfcp)
+		if (scfcp) {
+			barrier(); // Prevent race-reduction compiler optimizations.
 			scfcp->scfc_in = true;
+		}
 		smp_call_function_many(cpu_online_mask, scf_handler, scfcp, scfsp->scfs_wait);
 		break;
 	case SCF_PRIM_ALL:
@@ -348,8 +351,10 @@ static void scftorture_invoke_one(struct scf_statistics *scfp, struct torture_ra
 			scfp->n_all_wait++;
 		else
 			scfp->n_all++;
-		if (scfcp)
+		if (scfcp) {
+			barrier(); // Prevent race-reduction compiler optimizations.
 			scfcp->scfc_in = true;
+		}
 		smp_call_function(scf_handler, scfcp, scfsp->scfs_wait);
 		break;
 	}
@@ -358,6 +363,7 @@ static void scftorture_invoke_one(struct scf_statistics *scfp, struct torture_ra
 			atomic_inc(&n_mb_out_errs); // Leak rather than trash!
 		else
 			kfree(scfcp);
+		barrier(); // Prevent race-reduction compiler optimizations.
 	}
 	if (use_cpus_read_lock)
 		cpus_read_unlock();
-- 
2.9.5