linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.8 158/255] drm/amdkfd: fix the wrong sdma instance query for renoir

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200901151008.261580895@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue,  1 Sep 2020 17:10:14 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>,
        Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
        Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@....com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.8 158/255] drm/amdkfd: fix the wrong sdma instance query for renoir

From: Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>

[ Upstream commit 34174b89bfa495bed9cddcc504fb38feca90fab7 ]

Renoir only has one sdma instance, it will get failed once query the
sdma1 registers. So use switch-case instead of static register array.

Signed-off-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>
Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@....com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 .../gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gfx_v9.c | 31 +++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gfx_v9.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gfx_v9.c
index c7fd0c47b2545..1102de76d8767 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gfx_v9.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gfx_v9.c
@@ -195,19 +195,32 @@ static uint32_t get_sdma_rlc_reg_offset(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
 				unsigned int engine_id,
 				unsigned int queue_id)
 {
-	uint32_t sdma_engine_reg_base[2] = {
-		SOC15_REG_OFFSET(SDMA0, 0,
-				 mmSDMA0_RLC0_RB_CNTL) - mmSDMA0_RLC0_RB_CNTL,
-		SOC15_REG_OFFSET(SDMA1, 0,
-				 mmSDMA1_RLC0_RB_CNTL) - mmSDMA1_RLC0_RB_CNTL
-	};
-	uint32_t retval = sdma_engine_reg_base[engine_id]
+	uint32_t sdma_engine_reg_base = 0;
+	uint32_t sdma_rlc_reg_offset;
+
+	switch (engine_id) {
+	default:
+		dev_warn(adev->dev,
+			 "Invalid sdma engine id (%d), using engine id 0\n",
+			 engine_id);
+		fallthrough;
+	case 0:
+		sdma_engine_reg_base = SOC15_REG_OFFSET(SDMA0, 0,
+				mmSDMA0_RLC0_RB_CNTL) - mmSDMA0_RLC0_RB_CNTL;
+		break;
+	case 1:
+		sdma_engine_reg_base = SOC15_REG_OFFSET(SDMA1, 0,
+				mmSDMA1_RLC0_RB_CNTL) - mmSDMA0_RLC0_RB_CNTL;
+		break;
+	}
+
+	sdma_rlc_reg_offset = sdma_engine_reg_base
 		+ queue_id * (mmSDMA0_RLC1_RB_CNTL - mmSDMA0_RLC0_RB_CNTL);
 
 	pr_debug("RLC register offset for SDMA%d RLC%d: 0x%x\n", engine_id,
-			queue_id, retval);
+		 queue_id, sdma_rlc_reg_offset);
 
-	return retval;
+	return sdma_rlc_reg_offset;
 }
 
 static inline struct v9_mqd *get_mqd(void *mqd)
-- 
2.25.1