[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFqZXdtVokrDQvJAh-NzN0T2ayPD6MepemLEaDt1TRPduw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 17:36:17 +0200
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: "linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Linux-sh list <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mmc: mmc_spi: Allow the driver to be built when
CONFIG_HAS_DMA is unset
On Tue, 1 Sep 2020 at 17:06, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 05:04:38PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_DMA
> > +static int mmc_spi_dma_alloc(struct mmc_spi_host *host)
> > +{
> > + struct spi_device *spi = host->spi;
> > + struct device *dev;
> > +
> > + if (!spi->master->dev.parent->dma_mask)
> > + return 0;
>
> I still don't think this makes sense, as the dma_mask should always
> be non-NULL here.
If that is the case, I wonder how the driver could even have worked without DMA.
Because in the existing code, host->dma_dev gets assigned to
spi->master->dev.parent->dma_mask - which seems to turn on the DMA
usage in the driver.
What am I missing?
Kind regards
Uffe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists