linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.4 081/214] mm: fix kthread_use

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200901150956.873446830@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue,  1 Sep 2020 17:09:21 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 081/214] mm: fix kthread_use_mm() vs TLB invalidate

From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>

[ Upstream commit 38cf307c1f2011d413750c5acb725456f47d9172 ]

For SMP systems using IPI based TLB invalidation, looking at
current->active_mm is entirely reasonable.  This then presents the
following race condition:

  CPU0			CPU1

  flush_tlb_mm(mm)	use_mm(mm)
    <send-IPI>
			  tsk->active_mm = mm;
			  <IPI>
			    if (tsk->active_mm == mm)
			      // flush TLBs
			  </IPI>
			  switch_mm(old_mm,mm,tsk);

Where it is possible the IPI flushed the TLBs for @old_mm, not @mm,
because the IPI lands before we actually switched.

Avoid this by disabling IRQs across changing ->active_mm and
switch_mm().

Of the (SMP) architectures that have IPI based TLB invalidate:

  Alpha    - checks active_mm
  ARC      - ASID specific
  IA64     - checks active_mm
  MIPS     - ASID specific flush
  OpenRISC - shoots down world
  PARISC   - shoots down world
  SH       - ASID specific
  SPARC    - ASID specific
  x86      - N/A
  xtensa   - checks active_mm

So at the very least Alpha, IA64 and Xtensa are suspect.

On top of this, for scheduler consistency we need at least preemption
disabled across changing tsk->mm and doing switch_mm(), which is
currently provided by task_lock(), but that's not sufficient for
PREEMPT_RT.

[akpm@...ux-foundation.org: add comment]

Reported-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200721154106.GE10769@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 mm/mmu_context.c | 7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/mmu_context.c b/mm/mmu_context.c
index 3e612ae748e96..a1da47e027479 100644
--- a/mm/mmu_context.c
+++ b/mm/mmu_context.c
@@ -25,13 +25,16 @@ void use_mm(struct mm_struct *mm)
 	struct task_struct *tsk = current;
 
 	task_lock(tsk);
+	/* Hold off tlb flush IPIs while switching mm's */
+	local_irq_disable();
 	active_mm = tsk->active_mm;
 	if (active_mm != mm) {
 		mmgrab(mm);
 		tsk->active_mm = mm;
 	}
 	tsk->mm = mm;
-	switch_mm(active_mm, mm, tsk);
+	switch_mm_irqs_off(active_mm, mm, tsk);
+	local_irq_enable();
 	task_unlock(tsk);
 #ifdef finish_arch_post_lock_switch
 	finish_arch_post_lock_switch();
@@ -56,9 +59,11 @@ void unuse_mm(struct mm_struct *mm)
 
 	task_lock(tsk);
 	sync_mm_rss(mm);
+	local_irq_disable();
 	tsk->mm = NULL;
 	/* active_mm is still 'mm' */
 	enter_lazy_tlb(mm, tsk);
+	local_irq_enable();
 	task_unlock(tsk);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(unuse_mm);
-- 
2.25.1