[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89iJ87D3NXHk418Qeeuzr1ANp9STqMQtqdA_QyCpXL=24CQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 17:19:54 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Cc: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, George Spelvin <lkml@....org>,
Amit Klein <aksecurity@...il.com>,
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
Marc Plumb <lkml.mplumb@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] prandom_u32: make output less predictable
On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 4:55 PM Willy Tarreau <w@....eu> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 04:41:13PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > I have tested with the patchset from [1].
> > ( Later I saw, you dropped "WIP: tcp: reuse incoming skb hash in
> > tcp_conn_request()". )
>
> Yes because it's a bit out of the cope of this series and makes sense
> even without these patches, thus I assume Eric will take care of it
> separately.
Yes, I am still pondering on this one and really there is no hurry.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists