[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202009010816.80F4692@keescook>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 08:17:53 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Peter Collingbourne <pcc@...gle.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, x86@...nel.org,
clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/29] Warn on orphan section placement
On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 10:16:47AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> >
> > * Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > * Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 12:42:41PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > > > Hi Ingo,
> > > > >
> > > > > Based on my testing, this is ready to go. I've reviewed the feedback on
> > > > > v5 and made a few small changes, noted below.
> > > >
> > > > If no one objects, I'll pop this into my tree for -next. I'd prefer it
> > > > go via -tip though! :)
> > > >
> > > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > I'll pick it up today, it all looks very good now!
> >
> > One thing I found in testing is that it doesn't handler older LD
> > versions well enough:
> >
> > ld: unrecognized option '--orphan-handling=warn'
Oh! Uhm, yikes. Thanks for noticing this.
> > Could we just detect the availability of this flag, and emit a warning
> > if it doesn't exist but otherwise not abort the build?
Yeah, I'll respin those patches.
> > This is with:
> >
> > GNU ld version 2.25-17.fc23
(At best, this is from 2015 ... but yes, min binutils in 2.23.)
>
> I've resolved this for now by not applying the 5 patches that add the
> actual orphan section warnings:
>
> arm64/build: Warn on orphan section placement
> arm/build: Warn on orphan section placement
> arm/boot: Warn on orphan section placement
> x86/build: Warn on orphan section placement
> x86/boot/compressed: Warn on orphan section placement
>
> The new asserts plus the actual fixes/enhancements are enough changes
> to test for now in any case. :-)
Yup! I'll respin the enabling patches. Thanks again!
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists