[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200901172451.uckohkruradfhd6g@treble>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 12:24:51 -0500
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>, live-patching@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "kbuild: use -flive-patching when
CONFIG_LIVEPATCH is enabled"
On Thu, Aug 06, 2020 at 11:24:26AM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Tue 2020-07-21 13:17:00, Miroslav Benes wrote:
> > On Fri, 17 Jul 2020, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> >
> > > Use of the new -flive-patching flag was introduced with the following
> > > commit:
> > >
> > > 43bd3a95c98e ("kbuild: use -flive-patching when CONFIG_LIVEPATCH is enabled")
> > >
> > > This reverts commit 43bd3a95c98e1a86b8b55d97f745c224ecff02b9.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 43bd3a95c98e ("kbuild: use -flive-patching when CONFIG_LIVEPATCH is enabled")
> > > Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
> >
> > Acked-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>
>
> Acked-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
>
> Hmm, the patch has not been pushed into livepatching.git and is not
> available in the pull request for 5.9.
>
> Is it OK to leave it for 5.10?
> Or would you prefer to get it into 5.9 even on this stage?
>
> I personally do not mind. It depends how urgent it is for others.
Sorry for leaving this question hanging. Let's go with 5.10 ;-)
--
Josh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists