linux-kernel - [PATCH 16/27] blk-iocost: decouple vrate adjustment from surplus transfers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue,  1 Sep 2020 14:52:46 -0400
From:   Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:     axboe@...nel.dk
Cc:     linux-block@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com, newella@...com,
        Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 16/27] blk-iocost: decouple vrate adjustment from surplus transfers

Budget donations are inaccurate and could take multiple periods to converge.
To prevent triggering vrate adjustments while surplus transfers were
catching up, vrate adjustment was suppressed if donations were increasing,
which was indicated by non-zero nr_surpluses.

This entangling won't be necessary with the scheduled rewrite of donation
mechanism which will make it precise and immediate. Let's decouple the two
in preparation.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
---
 block/blk-iocost.c            | 19 +++++++------------
 include/trace/events/iocost.h | 13 ++++---------
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-iocost.c b/block/blk-iocost.c
index c1cd66cfa2a8..a3889a8b0a33 100644
--- a/block/blk-iocost.c
+++ b/block/blk-iocost.c
@@ -1508,7 +1508,7 @@ static void ioc_timer_fn(struct timer_list *timer)
 	struct ioc_gq *iocg, *tiocg;
 	struct ioc_now now;
 	LIST_HEAD(surpluses);
-	int nr_surpluses = 0, nr_shortages = 0, nr_lagging = 0;
+	int nr_shortages = 0, nr_lagging = 0;
 	u32 ppm_rthr = MILLION - ioc->params.qos[QOS_RPPM];
 	u32 ppm_wthr = MILLION - ioc->params.qos[QOS_WPPM];
 	u32 missed_ppm[2], rq_wait_pct;
@@ -1640,10 +1640,8 @@ static void ioc_timer_fn(struct timer_list *timer)
 			atomic64_add(delta, &iocg->vtime);
 			atomic64_add(delta, &iocg->done_vtime);
 			/* if usage is sufficiently low, maybe it can donate */
-			if (surplus_adjusted_hweight_inuse(usage, hw_inuse)) {
+			if (surplus_adjusted_hweight_inuse(usage, hw_inuse))
 				list_add(&iocg->surplus_list, &surpluses);
-				nr_surpluses++;
-			}
 		} else if (hw_inuse < hw_active) {
 			u32 new_hwi, new_inuse;
 
@@ -1673,7 +1671,7 @@ static void ioc_timer_fn(struct timer_list *timer)
 		}
 	}
 
-	if (!nr_shortages || !nr_surpluses)
+	if (!nr_shortages || list_empty(&surpluses))
 		goto skip_surplus_transfers;
 
 	/* there are both shortages and surpluses, transfer surpluses */
@@ -1738,11 +1736,9 @@ static void ioc_timer_fn(struct timer_list *timer)
 
 			/*
 			 * If there are IOs spanning multiple periods, wait
-			 * them out before pushing the device harder.  If
-			 * there are surpluses, let redistribution work it
-			 * out first.
+			 * them out before pushing the device harder.
 			 */
-			if (!nr_lagging && !nr_surpluses)
+			if (!nr_lagging)
 				ioc->busy_level--;
 		} else {
 			/*
@@ -1796,15 +1792,14 @@ static void ioc_timer_fn(struct timer_list *timer)
 		}
 
 		trace_iocost_ioc_vrate_adj(ioc, vrate, missed_ppm, rq_wait_pct,
-					   nr_lagging, nr_shortages,
-					   nr_surpluses);
+					   nr_lagging, nr_shortages);
 
 		atomic64_set(&ioc->vtime_rate, vrate);
 		ioc_refresh_margins(ioc);
 	} else if (ioc->busy_level != prev_busy_level || nr_lagging) {
 		trace_iocost_ioc_vrate_adj(ioc, atomic64_read(&ioc->vtime_rate),
 					   missed_ppm, rq_wait_pct, nr_lagging,
-					   nr_shortages, nr_surpluses);
+					   nr_shortages);
 	}
 
 	ioc_refresh_params(ioc, false);
diff --git a/include/trace/events/iocost.h b/include/trace/events/iocost.h
index a905ecc0342f..ee024fe8fef6 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/iocost.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/iocost.h
@@ -128,11 +128,9 @@ DEFINE_EVENT(iocg_inuse_update, iocost_inuse_reset,
 TRACE_EVENT(iocost_ioc_vrate_adj,
 
 	TP_PROTO(struct ioc *ioc, u64 new_vrate, u32 *missed_ppm,
-		u32 rq_wait_pct, int nr_lagging, int nr_shortages,
-		int nr_surpluses),
+		u32 rq_wait_pct, int nr_lagging, int nr_shortages),
 
-	TP_ARGS(ioc, new_vrate, missed_ppm, rq_wait_pct, nr_lagging, nr_shortages,
-		nr_surpluses),
+	TP_ARGS(ioc, new_vrate, missed_ppm, rq_wait_pct, nr_lagging, nr_shortages),
 
 	TP_STRUCT__entry (
 		__string(devname, ioc_name(ioc))
@@ -144,7 +142,6 @@ TRACE_EVENT(iocost_ioc_vrate_adj,
 		__field(u32, rq_wait_pct)
 		__field(int, nr_lagging)
 		__field(int, nr_shortages)
-		__field(int, nr_surpluses)
 	),
 
 	TP_fast_assign(
@@ -157,15 +154,13 @@ TRACE_EVENT(iocost_ioc_vrate_adj,
 		__entry->rq_wait_pct = rq_wait_pct;
 		__entry->nr_lagging = nr_lagging;
 		__entry->nr_shortages = nr_shortages;
-		__entry->nr_surpluses = nr_surpluses;
 	),
 
-	TP_printk("[%s] vrate=%llu->%llu busy=%d missed_ppm=%u:%u rq_wait_pct=%u lagging=%d shortages=%d surpluses=%d",
+	TP_printk("[%s] vrate=%llu->%llu busy=%d missed_ppm=%u:%u rq_wait_pct=%u lagging=%d shortages=%d",
 		__get_str(devname), __entry->old_vrate, __entry->new_vrate,
 		__entry->busy_level,
 		__entry->read_missed_ppm, __entry->write_missed_ppm,
-		__entry->rq_wait_pct, __entry->nr_lagging, __entry->nr_shortages,
-		__entry->nr_surpluses
+		__entry->rq_wait_pct, __entry->nr_lagging, __entry->nr_shortages
 	)
 );
 
-- 
2.26.2