[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200901205549.30096-2-ionela.voinescu@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 21:55:45 +0100
From: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@....com>
To: rjw@...ysocki.net, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, catalin.marinas@....com,
sudeep.holla@....com, will@...nel.org, valentin.schneider@....com
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ionela.voinescu@....com
Subject: [PATCH v5 1/5] arch_topology: validate input frequencies to arch_set_freq_scale()
The current frequency passed to arch_set_freq_scale() could end up
being 0, signaling an error in setting a new frequency. Also, if the
maximum frequency in 0, this will result in a division by 0 error.
Therefore, validate these input values before using them for the
setting of the frequency scale factor.
Signed-off-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@....com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>
---
drivers/base/arch_topology.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
index 75f72d684294..42a08ef693ae 100644
--- a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
+++ b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
@@ -33,6 +33,9 @@ void arch_set_freq_scale(struct cpumask *cpus, unsigned long cur_freq,
unsigned long scale;
int i;
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!cur_freq || !max_freq))
+ return;
+
/*
* If the use of counters for FIE is enabled, just return as we don't
* want to update the scale factor with information from CPUFREQ.
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists