[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200901074107.ozrthr5piqu723pa@linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 09:41:07 +0200
From: 'Sebastian Andrzej Siewior' <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Thomas Graziadei <thomas.graziadei@...cronenergy.com>
Cc: Mark Marshall <markmarshall14@...il.com>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
Mark Marshall <mark.marshall@...cronenergy.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"rostedt@...dmis.org" <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: Kernel crash due to memory corruption with v5.4.26-rt17 and
PowerPC e500
On 2020-08-12 14:45:22 [+0200], Thomas Graziadei wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
Hi Thomas,
> any progress on your side?
>
> Do you think the patch could be applied for the next versions?
Yes. The ->active_mm change needs to be protected against scheduling
regardless of the arch/mmu. Otherwise the mm will be put twice. For this
to trigger you need to exec from a kernel thread and get preempted.
This will be addressed in use_mm() by commit
38cf307c1f201 ("mm: fix kthread_use_mm() vs TLB invalidate")
which is in v5.9-rc1 and exec_mmap() is under discussion at
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arch/20200828100022.1099682-2-npiggin@gmail.com/
> Regards,
> Thomas
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists