[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200901075937.GA3602433@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 09:59:37 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Peter Collingbourne <pcc@...gle.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, x86@...nel.org,
clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/29] Warn on orphan section placement
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> * Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 12:42:41PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > Hi Ingo,
> > >
> > > Based on my testing, this is ready to go. I've reviewed the feedback on
> > > v5 and made a few small changes, noted below.
> >
> > If no one objects, I'll pop this into my tree for -next. I'd prefer it
> > go via -tip though! :)
> >
> > Thanks!
>
> I'll pick it up today, it all looks very good now!
One thing I found in testing is that it doesn't handler older LD
versions well enough:
ld: unrecognized option '--orphan-handling=warn'
Could we just detect the availability of this flag, and emit a warning
if it doesn't exist but otherwise not abort the build?
This is with:
GNU ld version 2.25-17.fc23
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists