linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 11/13] ARM: dts: exynos: Silence SATA PHY warning in Exynos5250 Arndale

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 1 Sep 2020 10:19:38 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To:     Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        "linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org" 
        <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
        Sylwester Nawrocki <snawrocki@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/13] ARM: dts: exynos: Silence SATA PHY warning in
 Exynos5250 Arndale

On Tue, 1 Sep 2020 at 10:17, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 1 Sep 2020 at 10:13, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Krzysztof,
> >
> > On 01.09.2020 09:54, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > The SATA PHY in Exynos5250 SoCs has two interfaces and two device nodes:
> > > 1. sata-phy@...70000
> > > 2. i2c-9/i2c@38
> > >
> > > The first node represents the actual SATA PHY device with phy-cells.
> > > The second represents additional I2C interface, needed by the driver
> > > to communicate with the SATA PHY device.  It is not a PHY-provider in
> > > the terms of dtschema so rename it to silence dtbs_check warning:
> > >
> > >    arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dt.yaml: sata-phy@38: '#phy-cells' is a required property
> > >      From schema: lib/python3.6/site-packages/dtschema/schemas/phy/phy-provider.yaml
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
> > > ---
> > >   arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts | 2 +-
> > >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
> > > index f2bcce167b2d..3c401c82905c 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
> > > @@ -544,7 +544,7 @@
> > >       samsung,i2c-max-bus-freq = <40000>;
> > >       samsung,i2c-slave-addr = <0x38>;
> > >
> > > -     sata_phy_i2c: sata-phy@38 {
> > > +     sata_phy_i2c: sata-phy-i2c@38 {
> > >               compatible = "samsung,exynos-sataphy-i2c";
> > >               reg = <0x38>;
> > >       };
> >
> > I'm not against the rename, but frankly, the above node and all i2c
> > parameters should be moved to exynos5250.dtsi. This is a SoC internal
> > things (the same way as hdmiphy in exynos4.dtsi), so the board dts
> > should only contain information like status = "enabled" for i2c_8 and
> > hdmi_i2c_phy nodes. No need to duplicate it here and in smdk5250.dts.
>
> Good point, the I2C bus used here is an internal part of SoC.
>
> I will squash these two changes into a new one. Thanks for the review!

While at it, I wonder about the samsung,i2c-slave-addr property. Is it
really needed? Are there multiple masters on this bus?

Best regards,
Krzysztof