[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200901083806.a2wz7idmfce2aj3a@vireshk-i7>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 14:08:06 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>, Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/8] drm/msm: Unconditionally call
dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table()
On 01-09-20, 13:01, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> So FWIU, dpu_unbind() gets called even when dpu_bind() fails for some reason.
Ahh, I see.
> I tried to address that earlier [1] which I realized did not land.
I don't think that patch was required, as you can call
dev_pm_opp_put_clkname() multiple times and it will return without any
errors/crash.
> But with these changes
> it will be even more broken unless we identify if we failed dpu_bind() before
> adding the OPP table, while adding it, or all went well with opps and handle things
> accordingly in dpu_unbind.
Maybe not as dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table() can be called multiple times
as well without any errors or crash.
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1275632/
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists