[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJKOXPf9rFVbMnEYURw-QTzJPvVu56BBoThsWq=teHggrRDAGw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 10:42:33 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
"linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <snawrocki@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/13] ARM: dts: exynos: Silence SATA PHY warning in
Exynos5250 Arndale
On Tue, 1 Sep 2020 at 10:36, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com> wrote:
> >>> I'm not against the rename, but frankly, the above node and all i2c
> >>> parameters should be moved to exynos5250.dtsi. This is a SoC internal
> >>> things (the same way as hdmiphy in exynos4.dtsi), so the board dts
> >>> should only contain information like status = "enabled" for i2c_8 and
> >>> hdmi_i2c_phy nodes. No need to duplicate it here and in smdk5250.dts.
> >> Good point, the I2C bus used here is an internal part of SoC.
> >>
> >> I will squash these two changes into a new one. Thanks for the review!
> > While at it, I wonder about the samsung,i2c-slave-addr property. Is it
> > really needed? Are there multiple masters on this bus?
>
> This might be some cargo-cult, probably copied from HDMI DDC (I'm not
> sure if it is needed there). I've removed it and SATA still works fine
> on Exynos5250 Arndale board.
Cool, thanks!
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists