[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2009011208260.2533@hadrien>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 12:08:43 +0200 (CEST)
From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>
To: Denis Efremov <efremov@...ux.com>
cc: cocci@...teme.lip6.fr, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
"Gustavo A . R . Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] coccinelle: misc: add uninitialized_var.cocci
script
On Tue, 1 Sep 2020, Denis Efremov wrote:
> uninitialized_var() macro was removed from the sources [1] and
> other warning-silencing tricks were deprecated [2]. The purpose of this
> cocci script is to prevent new occurrences of uninitialized_var()
> open-coded variants.
>
> [1] commit 63a0895d960a ("compiler: Remove uninitialized_var() macro")
> [2] commit 4b19bec97c88 ("docs: deprecated.rst: Add uninitialized_var()")
Thanks! I find that much more understandable.
julia
>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> Cc: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Denis Efremov <efremov@...ux.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Documentation cited in the script's description
> - kernel.org link added to the diagnostics messages
> - "T *var = &var;" pattern removed
> - "var =@p var", "var =@p *(&(var))" patterns added
> Changes in v3:
> - commit's description changed
>
> .../coccinelle/misc/uninitialized_var.cocci | 51 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 scripts/coccinelle/misc/uninitialized_var.cocci
>
> diff --git a/scripts/coccinelle/misc/uninitialized_var.cocci b/scripts/coccinelle/misc/uninitialized_var.cocci
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..8fa845cefe11
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/scripts/coccinelle/misc/uninitialized_var.cocci
> @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +///
> +/// Please, don't reintroduce uninitialized_var().
> +/// From Documentation/process/deprecated.rst:
> +/// For any compiler warnings about uninitialized variables, just add
> +/// an initializer. Using warning-silencing tricks is dangerous as it
> +/// papers over real bugs (or can in the future), and suppresses unrelated
> +/// compiler warnings (e.g. "unused variable"). If the compiler thinks it
> +/// is uninitialized, either simply initialize the variable or make compiler
> +/// changes. Keep in mind that in most cases, if an initialization is
> +/// obviously redundant, the compiler's dead-store elimination pass will make
> +/// sure there are no needless variable writes.
> +///
> +// Confidence: High
> +// Copyright: (C) 2020 Denis Efremov ISPRAS
> +// Options: --no-includes --include-headers
> +//
> +
> +virtual context
> +virtual report
> +virtual org
> +
> +@r@
> +identifier var;
> +type T;
> +position p;
> +@@
> +
> +(
> +* T var =@p var;
> +|
> +* T var =@p *(&(var));
> +|
> +* var =@p var
> +|
> +* var =@p *(&(var))
> +)
> +
> +@...ipt:python depends on report@
> +p << r.p;
> +@@
> +
> +coccilib.report.print_report(p[0],
> + "WARNING this kind of initialization is deprecated (https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#uninitialized-var)")
> +
> +@...ipt:python depends on org@
> +p << r.p;
> +@@
> +
> +coccilib.org.print_todo(p[0],
> + "WARNING this kind of initialization is deprecated (https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#uninitialized-var)")
> --
> 2.26.2
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists