[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200901133332.GY8299@kadam>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 16:33:32 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: antoniprzybylik <antoni.przybylik@...pl>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: gdm724x: gdm_tty: corrected macro by adding
brackets
On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 12:43:11PM +0200, antoniprzybylik wrote:
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Please, fix your From: header so that it says "Antoni Przybylik".
> Such macros are dangerous. Consider following example:
> #define GDM_TTY_READY(gdm) (gdm && gdm->tty_dev && gdm->port.count)
> GDM_TTY_READY(a + b)
> This macro will be expanded in such a way:
> (a + b && a + b->tty_dev && a + b->port.count)
> And it will lead to errors.
>
> Signed-off-by: Antoni Przybylik <antoni.przybylik@...pl>
> ---
> drivers/staging/gdm724x/gdm_tty.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/gdm724x/gdm_tty.c b/drivers/staging/gdm724x/gdm_tty.c
> index 6e813693a766..eab5c75ee5b1 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/gdm724x/gdm_tty.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/gdm724x/gdm_tty.c
> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
>
> #define MUX_TX_MAX_SIZE 2048
>
> -#define GDM_TTY_READY(gdm) (gdm && gdm->tty_dev && gdm->port.count)
> +#define GDM_TTY_READY(gdm) ((gdm) && (gdm)->tty_dev && (gdm)->port.count)
I cannot imagine a real life example where adding these parentheses will
prevent a bug. One idea it to silence this by making dereference ops
like this a special case where checkpatch.pl doesn't suggest adding
parentheses.
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists