[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <465ec9bf9b7b45fb98d7f21498328300@h3c.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 14:03:22 +0000
From: Tianxianting <tian.xianting@....com>
To: "axboe@...nel.dk" <axboe@...nel.dk>
CC: "linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] [v3] blk-mq: use BLK_MQ_NO_TAG for no tag
Hi Jens
Could I get the feedback from you whether this patch can be applied?
Thanks a lot.
-----Original Message-----
From: tianxianting (RD)
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2020 2:34 PM
To: axboe@...nel.dk
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; tianxianting (RD) <tian.xianting@....com>
Subject: [PATCH] [v3] blk-mq: use BLK_MQ_NO_TAG for no tag
Replace various magic -1 constants for tags with BLK_MQ_NO_TAG.
Signed-off-by: Xianting Tian <tian.xianting@....com>
---
block/blk-core.c | 4 ++--
block/blk-mq-sched.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c index d9d632639..c7eaf7504 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -116,8 +116,8 @@ void blk_rq_init(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq)
rq->__sector = (sector_t) -1;
INIT_HLIST_NODE(&rq->hash);
RB_CLEAR_NODE(&rq->rb_node);
- rq->tag = -1;
- rq->internal_tag = -1;
+ rq->tag = BLK_MQ_NO_TAG;
+ rq->internal_tag = BLK_MQ_NO_TAG;
rq->start_time_ns = ktime_get_ns();
rq->part = NULL;
refcount_set(&rq->ref, 1);
diff --git a/block/blk-mq-sched.c b/block/blk-mq-sched.c index a19cdf159..439481f59 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq-sched.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
@@ -522,7 +522,7 @@ void blk_mq_sched_insert_request(struct request *rq, bool at_head,
goto run;
}
- WARN_ON(e && (rq->tag != -1));
+ WARN_ON(e && (rq->tag != BLK_MQ_NO_TAG));
if (blk_mq_sched_bypass_insert(hctx, !!e, rq)) {
/*
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists