lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue,  1 Sep 2020 17:09:32 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 017/125] blktrace: ensure our debugfs dir exists

From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>

[ Upstream commit b431ef837e3374da0db8ff6683170359aaa0859c ]

We make an assumption that a debugfs directory exists, but since
this can fail ensure it exists before allowing blktrace setup to
complete. Otherwise we end up stuffing blktrace files on the debugfs
root directory. In the worst case scenario this *in theory* can create
an eventual panic *iff* in the future a similarly named file is created
prior on the debugfs root directory. This theoretical crash can happen
due to a recursive removal followed by a specific dentry removal.

This doesn't fix any known crash, however I have seen the files
go into the main debugfs root directory in cases where the debugfs
directory was not created due to other internal bugs with blktrace
now fixed.

blktrace is also completely useless without this directory, so
this ensures to userspace we only setup blktrace if the kernel
can stuff files where they are supposed to go into.

debugfs directory creations typically aren't checked for, and we have
maintainers doing sweep removals of these checks, but since we need this
check to ensure proper userspace blktrace functionality we make sure
to annotate the justification for the check.

Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 kernel/trace/blktrace.c | 12 ++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/blktrace.c b/kernel/trace/blktrace.c
index 7a4ca2deb39bc..1442f6152abc2 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/blktrace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/blktrace.c
@@ -529,6 +529,18 @@ static int do_blk_trace_setup(struct request_queue *q, char *name, dev_t dev,
 	if (!dir)
 		goto err;
 
+	/*
+	 * As blktrace relies on debugfs for its interface the debugfs directory
+	 * is required, contrary to the usual mantra of not checking for debugfs
+	 * files or directories.
+	 */
+	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dir)) {
+		pr_warn("debugfs_dir not present for %s so skipping\n",
+			buts->name);
+		ret = -ENOENT;
+		goto err;
+	}
+
 	bt->dev = dev;
 	atomic_set(&bt->dropped, 0);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bt->running_list);
-- 
2.25.1



Powered by blists - more mailing lists