linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.19 094/125] writeback: Protect inode->i_io_list with inode->i

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200901150939.199815190@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue,  1 Sep 2020 17:10:49 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Martijn Coenen <maco@...roid.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 094/125] writeback: Protect inode->i_io_list with inode->i_lock

From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>

commit b35250c0816c7cf7d0a8de92f5fafb6a7508a708 upstream.

Currently, operations on inode->i_io_list are protected by
wb->list_lock. In the following patches we'll need to maintain
consistency between inode->i_state and inode->i_io_list so change the
code so that inode->i_lock protects also all inode's i_io_list handling.

Reviewed-by: Martijn Coenen <maco@...roid.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
CC: stable@...r.kernel.org # Prerequisite for "writeback: Avoid skipping inode writeback"
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/fs-writeback.c |   22 +++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -160,6 +160,7 @@ static void inode_io_list_del_locked(str
 				     struct bdi_writeback *wb)
 {
 	assert_spin_locked(&wb->list_lock);
+	assert_spin_locked(&inode->i_lock);
 
 	list_del_init(&inode->i_io_list);
 	wb_io_lists_depopulated(wb);
@@ -1042,7 +1043,9 @@ void inode_io_list_del(struct inode *ino
 	struct bdi_writeback *wb;
 
 	wb = inode_to_wb_and_lock_list(inode);
+	spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
 	inode_io_list_del_locked(inode, wb);
+	spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
 	spin_unlock(&wb->list_lock);
 }
 
@@ -1091,8 +1094,10 @@ void sb_clear_inode_writeback(struct ino
  * the case then the inode must have been redirtied while it was being written
  * out and we don't reset its dirtied_when.
  */
-static void redirty_tail(struct inode *inode, struct bdi_writeback *wb)
+static void redirty_tail_locked(struct inode *inode, struct bdi_writeback *wb)
 {
+	assert_spin_locked(&inode->i_lock);
+
 	if (!list_empty(&wb->b_dirty)) {
 		struct inode *tail;
 
@@ -1103,6 +1108,13 @@ static void redirty_tail(struct inode *i
 	inode_io_list_move_locked(inode, wb, &wb->b_dirty);
 }
 
+static void redirty_tail(struct inode *inode, struct bdi_writeback *wb)
+{
+	spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
+	redirty_tail_locked(inode, wb);
+	spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
+}
+
 /*
  * requeue inode for re-scanning after bdi->b_io list is exhausted.
  */
@@ -1313,7 +1325,7 @@ static void requeue_inode(struct inode *
 		 * writeback is not making progress due to locked
 		 * buffers. Skip this inode for now.
 		 */
-		redirty_tail(inode, wb);
+		redirty_tail_locked(inode, wb);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1333,7 +1345,7 @@ static void requeue_inode(struct inode *
 			 * retrying writeback of the dirty page/inode
 			 * that cannot be performed immediately.
 			 */
-			redirty_tail(inode, wb);
+			redirty_tail_locked(inode, wb);
 		}
 	} else if (inode->i_state & I_DIRTY) {
 		/*
@@ -1341,7 +1353,7 @@ static void requeue_inode(struct inode *
 		 * such as delayed allocation during submission or metadata
 		 * updates after data IO completion.
 		 */
-		redirty_tail(inode, wb);
+		redirty_tail_locked(inode, wb);
 	} else if (inode->i_state & I_DIRTY_TIME) {
 		inode->dirtied_when = jiffies;
 		inode_io_list_move_locked(inode, wb, &wb->b_dirty_time);
@@ -1588,8 +1600,8 @@ static long writeback_sb_inodes(struct s
 		 */
 		spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
 		if (inode->i_state & (I_NEW | I_FREEING | I_WILL_FREE)) {
+			redirty_tail_locked(inode, wb);
 			spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
-			redirty_tail(inode, wb);
 			continue;
 		}
 		if ((inode->i_state & I_SYNC) && wbc.sync_mode != WB_SYNC_ALL) {