[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1cdb8cb1-3a08-423d-ba34-299ac1a4b9b4@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2020 11:55:56 -0500
From: Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>
To: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>, "J, KEERTHY" <j-keerthy@...com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>, <lokeshvutla@...com>,
<grygorii.strashko@...com>, <nsekhar@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am65-wakeup: Use generic
temperature-sensor for node name
On 9/1/20 5:30 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> Use temperature-sensor@ naming for nodes following standard conventions of device
> tree (section 2.2.2 Generic Names recommendation in [1]).
>
> [1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/tree/v0.3
>
> Suggested-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>
> Suggested-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>
> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-wakeup.dtsi | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-wakeup.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-wakeup.dtsi
> index bb498be2f0a4..ed42f13e7663 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-wakeup.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-wakeup.dtsi
> @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@
> clock-names = "gpio";
> };
>
> - wkup_vtm0: thermal@...50000 {
> + wkup_vtm0: temperature-sensor@...50000 {
There has been a suggestion to use something like thermal-sensor during the
bindings review, but it is better to use this standard node name.
Reviewed-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>
regards
Suman
> compatible = "ti,am654-vtm";
> reg = <0x42050000 0x25c>;
> power-domains = <&k3_pds 80 TI_SCI_PD_EXCLUSIVE>;
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists