[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <98adc930-00e2-67c8-4ba3-fcb1af3aafd2@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2020 10:18:38 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] tools/x86: add kcpuid tool to show raw CPU features
On 9/2/20 9:52 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> I was *really* hoping that we could eventually feed kcpuid and the
>> X86_FEATURE_* bits from the same source.
> But X86_FEATURE_* won't be all bits in all CPUID leafs - only the ones the
> kernel has enabled/use for/needs/...
>
> Also you have CPUID fields which are multi-bit and which cannot be
> X86_FEATURE_* things.
>
> So you need a place which has the whole CPUID space and X86_FEATURE_*
> simply cannot represent it all.
All good points.
Personally, I think I'd be OK if kcpuid _focused_ on single-bit values
only. Those are the vast majority of the things that we need from such
a tool. I don't think there's nearly as much demand for the topology
enumeration or TLB structure leaf parsing.
I also kinda doubt we can come up with a file format off the top of our
heads that can represent all the ways data is represented in the CPUID
space. Single bits, sure.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists