[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7b82468b-bc67-df62-1816-1f510888fc39@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2020 11:40:10 -0700
From: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: pshelar@....org, kuba@...nel.org, natechancellor@...il.com,
ndesaulniers@...gle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
dev@...nvswitch.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: openvswitch: pass NULL for unused parameters
On 9/1/20 1:11 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: trix@...hat.com
> Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 14:26:30 -0700
>
>> Passing unused parameters is a waste.
> Poorly predicted branches are an even bigger waste.
>
> I'm not a big fan of this change and others have asked for performance
> analysis to be performed.
>
> So I'm not applying this as-is, sorry.
no worries.
I think these functions need a larger working over so the stats collecting are not in the core functions.
Thanks for giving it a look,
Tom
>
> It's also not great to see that CLANG can't make use of the caller's
> __always_unused directive to guide these warnings.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists