lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <159907285417.18097.12464279240190546948.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 02 Sep 2020 19:54:14 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] regmap: Add can_sleep configuration option

On Wed, 2 Sep 2020 17:18:43 +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> Regmap can't sleep if spinlock is used for the locking protection.
> This patch fixes regression caused by a previous commit that switched
> regmap to use fsleep() and this broke Amlogic S922X platform.
> 
> This patch adds new configuration option for regmap users, allowing to
> specify whether regmap operations can sleep and assuming that sleep is
> allowed if mutex is used for the regmap locking protection.

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regmap.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] regmap: Add can_sleep configuration option
      commit: 21f8e4828c44da39b0670c5d99d5728b739542a1

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ