linux-kernel - Re: [v4,3/4] reset-controller: ti: introduce a new reset handler

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3a5decee-5f31-e27d-a120-1f835241a87c@ti.com>
Date:   Wed, 2 Sep 2020 18:40:24 -0500
From:   Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>
To:     Crystal Guo <crystal.guo@...iatek.com>, <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
CC:     <srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>,
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <seiya.wang@...iatek.com>, <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
        <yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com>, <fan.chen@...iatek.com>,
        <yong.liang@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [v4,3/4] reset-controller: ti: introduce a new reset handler

Hi Crystal,

On 8/16/20 10:03 PM, Crystal Guo wrote:
> Introduce ti_syscon_reset() to integrate assert and deassert together.
> If some modules need do serialized assert and deassert operations
> to reset itself, reset_control_reset can be called for convenience.

There are multiple changes in this same patch. I think you should split this
functionality away from the change for the regmap_update_bits() to
regmap_write_bits(), similar to what you have done in your v2 Patch 4.

> 
> Such as reset-qcom-aoss.c, it integrates assert and deassert together
> by 'reset' method. MTK Socs also need this method to perform reset.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Crystal Guo <crystal.guo@...iatek.com>
> ---
>  drivers/reset/reset-ti-syscon.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/reset/reset-ti-syscon.c b/drivers/reset/reset-ti-syscon.c
> index a2635c21db7f..08289342f9af 100644
> --- a/drivers/reset/reset-ti-syscon.c
> +++ b/drivers/reset/reset-ti-syscon.c
> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
>   * GNU General Public License for more details.
>   */
>  
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
>  #include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/of.h>
> @@ -56,6 +57,7 @@ struct ti_syscon_reset_data {
>  	struct regmap *regmap;
>  	struct ti_syscon_reset_control *controls;
>  	unsigned int nr_controls;
> +	unsigned int reset_duration_us;
>  };
>  
>  #define to_ti_syscon_reset_data(rcdev)	\
> @@ -89,7 +91,7 @@ static int ti_syscon_reset_assert(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
>  	mask = BIT(control->assert_bit);
>  	value = (control->flags & ASSERT_SET) ? mask : 0x0;
>  
> -	return regmap_update_bits(data->regmap, control->assert_offset, mask, value);
> +	return regmap_write_bits(data->regmap, control->assert_offset, mask, value);
>  }
>  
>  /**
> @@ -120,7 +122,7 @@ static int ti_syscon_reset_deassert(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
>  	mask = BIT(control->deassert_bit);
>  	value = (control->flags & DEASSERT_SET) ? mask : 0x0;
>  
> -	return regmap_update_bits(data->regmap, control->deassert_offset, mask, value);
> +	return regmap_write_bits(data->regmap, control->deassert_offset, mask, value);
>  }
>  
>  /**
> @@ -158,9 +160,26 @@ static int ti_syscon_reset_status(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
>  		!(control->flags & STATUS_SET);
>  }
>  
> +static int ti_syscon_reset(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
> +				  unsigned long id)
> +{
> +	struct ti_syscon_reset_data *data = to_ti_syscon_reset_data(rcdev);
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = ti_syscon_reset_assert(rcdev, id);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	if (data->reset_duration_us)
> +		usleep_range(data->reset_duration_us, data->reset_duration_us * 2);
> +
> +	return ti_syscon_reset_deassert(rcdev, id);

I echo Philipp's comments [1] from your original v1 series about this. We don't
need a property to distinguish this, but you could add a flag using match data
and Mediatek compatible, and use that within this function, or optionally set
this ops based on compatible (whatever is preferred by Philipp).

regards
Suman

[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/comment/23519193/

> +}
> +
>  static const struct reset_control_ops ti_syscon_reset_ops = {
>  	.assert		= ti_syscon_reset_assert,
>  	.deassert	= ti_syscon_reset_deassert,
> +	.reset		= ti_syscon_reset,
>  	.status		= ti_syscon_reset_status,
>  };
>  
> @@ -204,6 +223,9 @@ static int ti_syscon_reset_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		controls[i].flags = be32_to_cpup(list++);
>  	}
>  
> +	of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node,	"reset-duration-us",
> +				&data->reset_duration_us);
> +
>  	data->rcdev.ops = &ti_syscon_reset_ops;
>  	data->rcdev.owner = THIS_MODULE;
>  	data->rcdev.of_node = np;
>