linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] tmpfs: Restore functionality of nr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.11.2009012109030.5519@eggly.anvils>
Date:   Tue, 1 Sep 2020 21:22:09 -0700 (PDT)
From:   Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
To:     Byron Stanoszek <gandalf@...ds.org>
cc:     Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Chris Down <chris@...isdown.name>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tmpfs: Restore functionality of nr_inodes=0

On Tue, 1 Sep 2020, Byron Stanoszek wrote:

> Commit e809d5f0b5c9 ("tmpfs: per-superblock i_ino support") made changes to
> shmem_reserve_inode() in mm/shmem.c, however the original test for
> (sbinfo->max_inodes) got dropped. This causes mounting tmpfs with option
> nr_inodes=0 to fail:
> 
>   # mount -ttmpfs -onr_inodes=0 none /ext0
>   mount: /ext0: mount(2) system call failed: Cannot allocate memory.
> 
> This patch restores the nr_inodes=0 functionality.
> 
> Fixes: e809d5f0b5c9 ("tmpfs: per-superblock i_ino support")
> Cc: Chris Down <chris@...isdown.name>
> Signed-off-by: Byron Stanoszek <gandalf@...ds.org>

Yikes, thank you Byron, very bad of me not to have spotted that:

Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>

I've taken a quick look to see how I missed it: yes, I'd compared
against my own tree, knew I had to come back here sometime to replace
the SB_KERNMOUNT test by a max_inodes test like I had, to restore the
performance of nr_inodes=0; but thought the SB_KERNMOUNT test was good
enough for now - without realizing the effect on the code below it. The
error does seem to be localized just to this block, yes.  Many thanks.

> ---
>  mm/shmem.c | 10 ++++++----
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
> index 271548ca20f3..8e2b35ba93ad 100644
> --- a/mm/shmem.c
> +++ b/mm/shmem.c
> @@ -279,11 +279,13 @@ static int shmem_reserve_inode(struct super_block *sb, ino_t *inop)
>  
>  	if (!(sb->s_flags & SB_KERNMOUNT)) {
>  		spin_lock(&sbinfo->stat_lock);
> -		if (!sbinfo->free_inodes) {
> -			spin_unlock(&sbinfo->stat_lock);
> -			return -ENOSPC;
> +		if (sbinfo->max_inodes) {
> +			if (!sbinfo->free_inodes) {
> +				spin_unlock(&sbinfo->stat_lock);
> +				return -ENOSPC;
> +			}
> +			sbinfo->free_inodes--;
>  		}
> -		sbinfo->free_inodes--;
>  		if (inop) {
>  			ino = sbinfo->next_ino++;
>  			if (unlikely(is_zero_ino(ino)))
> -- 
> 2.28.0