[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <04938d51-4b93-d02a-9edd-39ce781b8d5d@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2020 10:42:18 +0530
From: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.ibm.com>
To: paulus@...ba.org
Cc: mpe@...erman.id.au, mikey@...ling.org, npiggin@...il.com,
pbonzini@...hat.com, christophe.leroy@....fr, jniethe5@...il.com,
pedromfc@...ibm.com, rogealve@...ibm.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
kvm-ppc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] powerpc/watchpoint/kvm: Add infrastructure to support
2nd DAWR
Hi Paul,
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hvcall.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hvcall.h
> index 33793444144c..03f401d7be41 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hvcall.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hvcall.h
> @@ -538,6 +538,8 @@ struct hv_guest_state {
> s64 tb_offset;
> u64 dawr0;
> u64 dawrx0;
> + u64 dawr1;
> + u64 dawrx1;
> u64 ciabr;
> u64 hdec_expiry;
> u64 purr;
After this struct, there is a macro HV_GUEST_STATE_VERSION, I guess that
also needs to be incremented because I'm adding new members in the struct?
Thanks,
Ravi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists