linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Remove bouncing email of Beniamin Bia

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 2 Sep 2020 05:56:41 +0000
From:   "Ardelean, Alexandru" <alexandru.Ardelean@...log.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
CC:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Hennerich, Michael" <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
        linux-iio <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Remove bouncing email of Beniamin Bia

[yes, I know, bad-email format, but I wanted this to come from my work email]

Apologies also for the delay here. Things pile-up on my side and I defer things a bit.

Talked to Michael Hennerich about this [since he's the more senior contact at Analog].
We can replace the email from Beniamin Bia with Michael's.
Or, we can remove the "Orphan" blocks and just have the catch-all "drivers/iio/*/ad*" cover this driver and others that were upstreamed by Beniamin.

Either option is fine from us.

-----Original Message-----
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> 
Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2020 5:58 PM
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>; Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>; Hennerich, Michael <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>; linux-iio <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>; Ardelean, Alexandru <alexandru.Ardelean@...log.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Remove bouncing email of Beniamin Bia

On Sat, 29 Aug 2020 at 16:54, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org> wrote:

(...)

> > >  ANALOG DEVICES INC AD7091R5 DRIVER
> > > -M:     Beniamin Bia <beniamin.bia@...log.com>
> > >  L:     linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
> > > -S:     Supported
> > > +S:     Orphan
>
> Given it should be covered by the catch all for Analog devices IIO 
> drivers, either we should confirm if it should move to someone else at 
> Analog, or if we should just drop specifically listing this one.
> Listing it as Orphan when they are good at supporting their drivers 
> may give the wrong impression.
>
> +CC Alex to make sure people at Analog notice :)

Sure, good point. I wanted to start the discussion so the interested people might appear.

Best regards,
Krzysztof