[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DB6PR0402MB27601BDD395CC7F5B2D33C0D882F0@DB6PR0402MB2760.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2020 01:11:42 +0000
From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
To: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
CC: dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@....com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
"linux@...ck-us.net" <linux@...ck-us.net>,
"m.szyprowski@...sung.com" <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
"naresh.kamboju@...aro.org" <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Dong Aisheng <dongas86@...il.com>,
"kernel-team@...roid.com" <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] driver core: Fix device_pm_lock() locking for device
links
> Subject: [PATCH v2] driver core: Fix device_pm_lock() locking for device links
>
> This commit fixes two issues:
>
> 1. The lockdep warning reported by Dong Aisheng <dongas86@...il.com>
> [1].
>
> It is a warning about a cycle (dpm_list_mtx --> kn->active#3 --> fw_lock) that
> was introduced when device-link devices were added to expose device link
> information in sysfs.
>
> The patch that "introduced" this cycle can't be reverted because it's fixes a
> real SRCU issue and also ensures that the device-link device is deleted as
> soon as the device-link is deleted. This is important to avoid sysfs name
> collisions if the device-link is create again immediately (this can happen a lot
> with deferred probing).
>
> 2. Inconsistency in grabbing device_pm_lock() during device link deletion
>
> Some device link deletion code paths grab device_pm_lock(), while others
> don't. The device_pm_lock() is grabbed during device_link_add() because it
> checks if the supplier is in the dpm_list and also reorders the dpm_list.
> However, when a device link is deleted, it does not do either of those and
> therefore device_pm_lock() is not necessary. Dropping the device_pm_lock()
> in all the device link deletion paths removes the inconsistency in locking.
>
> Thanks to Stephen Boyd for helping me understand the lockdep splat.
>
> Fixes: 843e600b8a2b ("driver core: Fix sleeping in invalid context during
> device link deletion") [1] -
> https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flore.ke
> rnel.org%2Flkml%2FCAA%2BhA%3DS4eAreb7vo69LAXSk2t5%3DDEKNxHaiY1
> wSpk4xTp9urLg%40mail.gmail.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cpeng.fan%4
> 0nxp.com%7Cc07e23dccfa84d96b17808d84ea71bb9%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6f
> a92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C637345826922594698&sdata=X0Pzb
> ni5QcjxOCWkfR9uvxRcfvpzPQSNMmk%2BJf93dYI%3D&reserved=0
> Reported-by: Dong Aisheng <dongas86@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
Tested-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
Thanks,
Peng.
> ---
>
> Cc'ing everyone from the original thread [1]
>
> -Saravana
>
> drivers/base/core.c | 4 ----
> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c index
> f6f620aa9408..07e5ceb40bb1 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/core.c
> @@ -807,9 +807,7 @@ static void device_link_put_kref(struct device_link
> *link) void device_link_del(struct device_link *link) {
> device_links_write_lock();
> - device_pm_lock();
> device_link_put_kref(link);
> - device_pm_unlock();
> device_links_write_unlock();
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_link_del);
> @@ -830,7 +828,6 @@ void device_link_remove(void *consumer, struct
> device *supplier)
> return;
>
> device_links_write_lock();
> - device_pm_lock();
>
> list_for_each_entry(link, &supplier->links.consumers, s_node) {
> if (link->consumer == consumer) {
> @@ -839,7 +836,6 @@ void device_link_remove(void *consumer, struct
> device *supplier)
> }
> }
>
> - device_pm_unlock();
> device_links_write_unlock();
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_link_remove);
> --
> 2.28.0.402.g5ffc5be6b7-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists