linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ath10k: Use bdf calibration variant for snoc targets

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87y2ls4lbf.fsf@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Wed, 02 Sep 2020 11:47:16 +0300
From:   Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
To:     Rakesh Pillai <pillair@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     ath10k@...ts.infradead.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: Use bdf calibration variant for snoc targets

Rakesh Pillai <pillair@...eaurora.org> writes:

> Board Data File (BDF) is loaded upon driver boot-up procedure.
> The right board data file is identified using bus and qmi-board-id.
>
> The problem, however, can occur when the (default) board data
> file cannot fulfill with the vendor requirements and it is
> necessary to use a different board data file.
>
> Add the support to get the variant field from DTSI and
> use tht information to load the vendor specific BDF.
>
> The device tree requires addition strings to define the variant name
>
>     wifi@...0000 {
>             status = "okay";
>             qcom,ath10k-calibration-variant = "xyz-v2";
>     };
>
>     wifi@...0000 {
>             status = "okay";
>             qcom,ath10k-calibration-variant = "xyz-v1";
>     };
>
> This would create the boarddata identifiers for the board-2.bin search
>
>  *  bus=snoc,qmi-board-id=16,qmi-chip-id=0,variant=xyz-v1
>  *  bus=snoc,qmi-board-id=17,qmi-chip-id=0,variant=xyz-v2

You mention nothing about qmi-chip-id in the commit log. Please document
what it is and also give some examples what kind of values there can be.

> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/qmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/qmi.c
> @@ -576,6 +576,8 @@ static int ath10k_qmi_cap_send_sync_msg(struct ath10k_qmi *qmi)
>  	if (resp->chip_info_valid) {
>  		qmi->chip_info.chip_id = resp->chip_info.chip_id;
>  		qmi->chip_info.chip_family = resp->chip_info.chip_family;
> +	} else {
> +		qmi->chip_info.chip_id = 0xFF;
>  	}

So you hard code chip_id to 0xff if it's not valid. Is it 100%
guaranteed that there never will be a chip id with 0xff?

>  
>  	if (resp->board_info_valid)
> @@ -817,12 +819,18 @@ static void ath10k_qmi_event_server_arrive(struct ath10k_qmi *qmi)
>  static int ath10k_qmi_fetch_board_file(struct ath10k_qmi *qmi)
>  {
>  	struct ath10k *ar = qmi->ar;
> +	int ret;
>  
>  	ar->hif.bus = ATH10K_BUS_SNOC;
>  	ar->id.qmi_ids_valid = true;
>  	ar->id.qmi_board_id = qmi->board_info.board_id;
> +	ar->id.qmi_chip_id = qmi->chip_info.chip_id;

To me a safer, and cleaner, option would be to have
ar->id.qmi_chip_id_valid, and only add qmi-chip-id=%x to the board id if
qmi_chip_id_valid is true. That way there's not this magic 0xff value
hardcoded anywhere.

-- 
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches