linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf cs-etm: Fix corrupt data after perf inject from

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200902014754.GA3444345@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 1 Sep 2020 22:47:54 -0300
From:   Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To:     Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
Cc:     Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Al Grant <al.grant@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf cs-etm: Fix corrupt data after perf inject from

Em Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 08:39:32AM +0800, Leo Yan escreveu:
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 11:54:32AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 08:04:32AM +0800, Leo Yan escreveu:
> > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 02:53:54PM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 04:47:50PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
> > > > I've see this patch before...  I thought it had been merged - what happened?

> > > This patch before has been sent by Al to CoreSight mailing list but has
> > > not sent to LKML, this is why I resent it to LKML in case it's missed.

> > So, was it Acked on the CoreSight mailing list? Are we missing any
> > Acked-by or Reviewed-by for this 1/2 patch as we got for 2/2?
 
> The CoreSight mailing list has some discussion for this patch set,
> when respin this patch set, I confirmed we don't miss any 'Acked' or
> 'Reviewed' tags.

So, this patch was included in today's
perf-tools-fixes-for-v5.9-2020-09-01 signed tag sent to Linus in a pull
req, please update your perf/urgent branch, and go on from there, I'll
merge that into my perf/core branch as soon as Linus merges it.

- Arnaldo