[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200902094806.GA5567@willie-the-truck>
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2020 10:48:06 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>
Cc: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>, lorenzo.pieralisi@....com,
sudeep.holla@....com, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
wanghaibin.wang@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] ACPI/IORT: Code cleanups
On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 05:17:43PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> +Cc Will
>
> On 2020/8/18 17:16, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> > On 2020/8/18 14:36, Zenghui Yu wrote:
> > > * From v1 [1]:
> > > - As pointed out by Hanjun, remove two now unused inline functions.
> > > Compile tested with CONFIG_IOMMU_API is not selected.
> > >
> > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200817105946.1511-1-yuzenghui@huawei.com
> > >
> > > Zenghui Yu (2):
> > > ACPI/IORT: Drop the unused @ops of iort_add_device_replay()
> > > ACPI/IORT: Remove the unused inline functions
> > >
> > > drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c | 10 ++--------
> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > Nice cleanup.
> >
> > Acked-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>
>
> Will, would you mind taking this patch set via ARM64 tree?
Sure, no problem. I'll queue this for 5.10 later this week.
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists