lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 2 Sep 2020 06:39:07 -0400 (EDT)
From:   David Hildenbrand <dhildenb@...hat.com>
To:     Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc:     Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>,
        Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
        Bharata B Rao <bharata@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
        Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Kernel Team <Kernel-team@...com>,
        Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>,
        stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/28] The new cgroup slab memory controller



> Am 02.09.2020 um 11:53 schrieb Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>:
> 
> On 8/28/20 6:47 PM, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
>> There appears to be another problem that is related to the
>> cgroup_mutex -> mem_hotplug_lock deadlock described above.
>> 
>> In the original deadlock that I described, the workaround is to
>> replace crash dump from piping to Linux traditional save to files
>> method. However, after trying this workaround, I still observed
>> hardware watchdog resets during machine  shutdown.
>> 
>> The new problem occurs for the following reason: upon shutdown systemd
>> calls a service that hot-removes memory, and if hot-removing fails for
> 
> Why is that hotremove even needed if we're shutting down? Are there any
> (virtualization?) platforms where it makes some difference over plain
> shutdown/restart?

If all it‘s doing is offlining random memory that sounds unnecessary and dangerous. Any pointers to this service so we can figure out what it‘s doing and why? (Arch? Hypervisor?)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ