[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+CK2bA6EpfSMZD6egysFqdw0tZFuPAxEJc-rQbJTnjf+u2TGA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2020 08:53:49 -0400
From: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
Bharata B Rao <bharata@...ux.ibm.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Team <Kernel-team@...com>,
Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/28] The new cgroup slab memory controller
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 7:32 AM Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed 02-09-20 11:53:00, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > >> > > Thread #2: ccs killer kthread
> > >> > > css_killed_work_fn
> > >> > > cgroup_mutex <- Grab this Mutex
> > >> > > mem_cgroup_css_offline
> > >> > > memcg_offline_kmem.part
> > >> > > memcg_deactivate_kmem_caches
> > >> > > get_online_mems
> > >> > > mem_hotplug_lock <- waits for Thread#1 to get read access
>
> And one more thing. THis has been brought up several times already.
> Maybe I have forgoten but why do we take hotplug locks in this path in
> the first place? Memory hotplug notifier takes slab_mutex so this
> shouldn't be really needed.
Good point, it seems this lock can be completely removed from
memcg_deactivate_kmem_caches
Pasha
> --
> Michal Hocko
> SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists